Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Facebook

Ok Ok, I admit, I like facebook, I even have my real name on it now. Its fun, easy to use, very very convenient and a great way to catch up with old friends without spending lots of time talking (because frankly very few of us have that much time nowadays). But as much as I like facebook I wonder... and just wonder.... I was looking through a friends page and saw a picture of his friend (i'm hoping thats all she was) ... a girl... ok more like woman.. she looked 28ish?Anyway, this girl has a "wonderful" profile picture - a picture of herself straight out NAKED, incase you're wondering not one of those wonderful artistic ones of an artistic body where things are left to your imagination, I mean crazy n-a-k-e-d ie you can see every pore and mole on her face, breasts and hanging belly. May I mention that judging from the picture, I dont believe she is a model by profession (not at a legitimate agency anyway) and that this was a closeup? uurrgghhh but thats besides the point.

Now.. surely... I know I should'nt judge...but John Francis says the only reason foolishness exists in the church is because we dont speak up when we see it, and people keep making the same mistake. So this is me speaking up even though its not in the church because facebook has become a craze and some of us are getting a bit carried away... what in heavens name and on God's green earth possesses someone in their right mind to not only take such a picture and post it on a public site where they cant control its access or use, but to also put their name, their face, their hometown and their school and work next to it? Am I the only one who thinks this is dense? I wonder...

Well... I ran into this article while that nasty picture and this issue was still swirling around in my head. If you are one of those people who's living their life on a 12 inch screen instead of real life - I hope this article motivates you to journal, or buy a video camera (just keep the tapes locked) or a tape recorder... whatever - just spare us the shock of your lack of foresight. Information is power and once one of these little indulgences come out, its virtually impossible to control what happens to them, especially when you finally grow up and want to be taken seriously. (And I wont even get started about those folks who have their full names, full addresses, phone numbers, schools including dorm names, and pictures with their possessions ... all on facebook). My husband used to call me paranoid and I may be... somewhat... if you insist.... but in this day of stalkers and perverts is'nt that just plain dumb??
Well....Happy reading!

Job candidates getting tripped up by Facebook
Many students learn the hard way that online image can limit opportunity
By Wei Du

Van Allen runs a company that recruits job candidates for hospitals and clinics across the country. With physicians in short supply, he was happy to come across the resume of a well-qualified young female psychiatrist. As part of his due diligence check, Allen looked her up in Facebook, a popular social networking Web site, and found things that made him think twice.
“Pictures of her taking off her shirt at parties,” he said. “Not just on one occasion, but on another occasion, then another occasion.”
Concerned about those pictures, he called the candidate and asked for an explanation. She didn’t get the job.
“Hospitals want doctors with great skills to provide great services to communities,” Allen said. “They also don’t want patients to say to each other, 'Heard about Dr. Jones? You’ve got to see those pictures.’”
Job candidates who maintain personal sites on Facebook or MySpace are learning — sometimes the hard way — that the image they present to their friends on the Internet may not be best suited for landing the position they’re seeking.
Although many employers are too old to qualify as members of the Facebook Generation, they’re becoming increasingly savvy about using social networking sites in their hiring due diligence. That has both job candidates and human resources professionals debating the ethics and effectiveness of snooping on the Web for the kind of information that may not come up in an interview. According to a March survey by Ponemon Institute, a privacy think tank, 35 percent of hiring managers use Google to do online background checks on job candidates, and 23 percent look people up on social networking sites. About one-third of those Web searches lead to rejections, according to the survey.
Social networking sites have gained popularity among hiring managers because of their convenience and a growing anxiety about hiring the right people, researchers say.
Big corporations long have retained professional investigators to check job applicants’ academic degrees, criminal records and credit reports. But until now the cost has deterred the ability of smaller firms to do the same level of checking, said Sue Murphy, a director of National Human Resources Association.
One problem is that there is little to prevent hiring managers from discriminating on the basis of personal information discovered through social Web sites.
"There's just not much legislation on that yet," Murphy said.
New college graduates, the most active social networkers, are most likely to be the target of Web research.
“For people new to a field, companies just don’t have a lot to look back on,” Murphy said. “They can’t call up your former boss. They look you up on Facebook.”
Financial services firms and the health care providers are among the biggest users of social networking sites, said Larry Ponemon, founder of the Ponemon Institute.
“These industries are stewards of people’s property and health, and companies really look for a high level of integrity,” said Ponemon.
Professional services like law and consulting firms also are big users, because companies care about how employees present themselves to clients and look for clues in how applicants present themselves online.
Risqué pictures are not the only way a job applicant can be tripped up. Pictures of illegal behavior like drug use, or heavy alcohol use, could disqualify a candidate. Some also suggest poor writing and bad grammar on Facebook profiles and in blog entries can raise a red flag about communication skills. Derogatory comments or complaints or radical political positions also can draw the scrutiny of a prospective employer.
One job applicant indicated in his Facebook profile that he was a leading hacker, and he was applying to be a computer security analyst, said Ponemon. He didn’t get the job.
“It’s amazing how many things people just put out there,” said Murphy of the human resources association.
Facebook users often don’t expect their personal information to be monitored by potential employers, and many consider their online profile information to be private.
A study by IDPa workforce consulting firm, showed that 66 percent of Generation Y respondents, those in their late teens and 20s, were not aware the information they put online can be factored into hiring decisions. Fifty-six percent said they think the practice is unfair.
Originally Facebook was seen as a safe "closed circuit" site, in which profiles would only be visible to people in a limited group. The site originally required users to register with a valid college e-mail address. But the site loosened the restriction last summer to allow anyone to register with a valid e-mail account. Facebook networks, which had been relatively small, expanded to include companies and even large geographic areas.
The new policies of Facebook drew public attention this year when Miss New Jersey Amy Polumbo nearly lost her crown after being blackmailed over pictures of her that were taken off her Facebook profile. Ultimately the judges decided not to take away her title, but her crown was tarnished.
“This was meant to be private,” Polumbo told TODAY Show host Matt Lauer, referring to photos that showed her fully clothed but posing provocatively and drinking at clubs.
“People have a common misconception about how big their networks really are,” said Michael Fertik, CEO of Reputationdefender.com, a year-old startup offering services to minimize the damage of Web background checks. “Nothing on the Internet is private. Period.”
Reputationdefender.com offers to monitor one’s Web reputation for $10 a month plus a one-time fee of $30 to remove from the Web an unwanted item that may have slipped out of the user’s control.
In one high-profile case last spring, a group of law school students found that pictures were taken off their Facebook accounts and reposted onto an online discussion board without their permission. Whoever posted the pictures then invited suggestive comments.
The law students tried to have their pictures removed from the discussion board, complaining that had been shunned in job interviews.
“People also have to understand the standard you will be judged against in hiring,” said Fertik. “Employers don’t have to believe what they see — they only have to decide not to take a chance on you.”
Cleaning up your Web self : Career consultants advise students to check their online appearance before applying for jobs. Some tips:
-- Google yourself early and often, to know what has been said about you. If you see false or unauthorized information, ask the webmaster to remove the content.
-- Be careful about what you post on social networking sites. Don't post anything you wouldn't want a potential employer to see. Change the privacy setting to make personal information available only to close friends.
-- Create a positive virtual presence. Start a blog about your industry. It might not lead to a job, but it will help define your online persona and help push down unfavorable items in Web searches.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home